Legislation Details

File #: 25-052    Name: Accept Transit Roof
Type: Report/Consent Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 1/27/2025 In control: City Council
On agenda: 2/19/2025 Final action:
Enactment date: Enactment #:
Title: Accept Improvements Under Contract for Lodi Transit Station Roof Replacement (PW)
Date Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

AGENDA TITLE:
title
Accept Improvements Under Contract for Lodi Transit Station Roof Replacement (PW)
end

MEETING DATE:
February 19, 2025

PREPARED BY:
Public Works Director


recommendation
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Accept improvements under contract for Lodi Transit Station Roof Replacement.

body
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The Lodi Transit Station building was restored in 1999 after being relocated from the adjacent property. That restoration included the installation of a new asphalt shingle (composite) roof. That roof as at the end of its useful life, and had multiple leaks in recent years. These leaks caused dry rot, as well as mold and other weather-related issues.

This project removed the existing roof and installed new roof flashing and felt paper, and installed a new "30-year" composite roof.

On June 5, 2024, Council approved the plans, specifications, advertisement, and authorized the City Manager to award the contract up to $200,000 with Change Order authority not-to-exceed $30,000. Bids were received on August 20, 2024, with Waterproofing Associates, Inc. being the only bidder (see breakdown below).

Above/(Below)
Bidder Location Base Bid Bid Alt.* Engineer's Base Est.
Engineer's Estimate $120,000.00 $ 20,000.00
Waterproofing Assoc., Inc. Lodi $ 83,480.00 $ 9,500.00 ($36,520.00)
* Bid alternate not awarded

The contractor started work on December 3, 2024, and completed the work on January 2, 2025. The contract was completed in substantial conformance with the specifications approved by City Council. The final contract price was $97,361, which is $13,881 more than the original contract price. This increase (Change Order No. 1) was due to the necessary replacement of a PVC roof liner that during construction, was found to be bubbling and in poor overall condition. The liner replacement was out of scope work that needed to be performed prior to the new roof being installed.

Following acceptance by the City ...

Click here for full text